There are 318 users in the forums
A new woman's sports bar called Blazers is opening in Brooklyn.
— domo #knicksin4 (@ddubxdo) October 15, 2025
It was started by 3 women who bonded over their love for the NY Liberty
Check them out on IG @blazerssportsbar pic.twitter.com/fMXBUr7nBd
Sophie Cunningham launched her drive into the crowd during the Annika Pro-Am and several older gentleman faked getting hit so they could get a hug 😅
— NUCLR GOLF (@NUCLRGOLF) November 12, 2025
pic.twitter.com/hc9Q6x6XXi
Breaking: The WNBA and Women's National Basketball Players Association reached a verbal agreement on the terms for a new collective bargaining agreement that for the first time in league history ties its salary system to revenue growth and is expected to offer $1M salaries. pic.twitter.com/UINJdjgNH7
— ESPN (@espn) March 18, 2026
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Interesting. But even as a tax write off, they arent making money. They are probably not losing as much as it seems, but the league hasnt turned a profit in 3 decades.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Interesting. But even as a tax write off, they arent making money. They are probably not losing as much as it seems, but the league hasnt turned a profit in 3 decades.
those losses are nothing compared to appreciation of the asset. look at the average team valuation today. after this latest TV deal, it's now at like a 20x increase from 10 years ago.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Interesting. But even as a tax write off, they arent making money. They are probably not losing as much as it seems, but the league hasnt turned a profit in 3 decades.
those losses are nothing compared to appreciation of the asset. look at the average team valuation today. after this latest TV deal, it's now at like a 20x increase from 10 years ago.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Interesting. But even as a tax write off, they arent making money. They are probably not losing as much as it seems, but the league hasnt turned a profit in 3 decades.
those losses are nothing compared to appreciation of the asset. look at the average team valuation today. after this latest TV deal, it's now at like a 20x increase from 10 years ago.
I agree with this. But what the average valuation today, with the TV deal, doesnt change what I said about years past.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by evil:
They are finally going to get a fair share. Good on the ladies, yall deserve it.
As someone who has watched Women's basketball for years, but also understand basic economics, they have gotten more than a fair share since the inception of the league. You cant demand higher salaries when the league hemorrhages money every year.
These ladies better thank their lucky stars for Caitlin Clark or the league would have folded decades ago.
I was listening to Rich Eisen a couple days ago and he had a guest on talking about this, who's also an economist. He was basically saying the the owners aren't really losing any money on league bc of the massive tax write offs they can do, since they are showing a loss on paper.
Interesting. But even as a tax write off, they arent making money. They are probably not losing as much as it seems, but the league hasnt turned a profit in 3 decades.
those losses are nothing compared to appreciation of the asset. look at the average team valuation today. after this latest TV deal, it's now at like a 20x increase from 10 years ago.
I agree with this. But what the average valuation today, with the TV deal, doesnt change what I said about years past.
ehh you said "basic economics" while saying the ladies shouldn't demand higher salaries, seemingly not understanding how the league can "lose money" yet become way more valuable. and the valuations were on an upward trajectory even before the TV deal.